Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | anth1y's commentslogin

Github is down for me...


It really depends on your Operating System.


skills can be learned.


Then learn them before you apply for a job so that you can be competitive.


For what it's worth I had asked someone the very same question when I started my career.

From the horses mouth take a look at ext4 on ubuntu https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LinuxFilesystemsExplained

Then a 10,000 mile view, I'd take a look at UNIX and Linux https://www.amazon.com/UNIX-Linux-System-Administration-Hand...

There are more books I could list and papers on FileSystems. I will leave you with three particular books that have guided my career

If you want to look solely at Ubuntu. The Ubuntu Server book https://www.amazon.com/Official-Ubuntu-Server-Book-3rd/dp/01...

Unix Made Easy - https://www.amazon.com/UNIX-Made-Easy-John-Muster/dp/0072193...

Hope this helps


Servers are on the network as well... and the phrasing is more towards the "network" as an environment.


I'm just getting started with riemann and I'm also learning clojure at the same time. How did you get buy in from your company to use riemann


I co-founded it :-)


They could be talking about pid 0 : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_identifier (See swapper or schedule)



This is awesome nicely done man!


> Ok, I understand that there's reasons for using static pages, but I don't get the feeling this guy really understands what he's talking about.

I think he might know a little bit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Vixie


None of the things on that wikipedia page makes me think he actually knows anything about web servers. Sure, he obviously should know about some of the things that make the internet work (BIND, cron, etc) but nothing on there has anything to do with making web sites. All of it is about the infrastructure.

Either this article is filled with intentional hyperbole, or this guy doesn't know what he's talking about when it comes to serving web pages.


Ordinarily I'd be bristling at a comment like this, but you are articulating some stuff --- a little rudely, but still --- that I believe about Vixie as well. I won't pretend not to have noticed and let you take all the heat. Paul Vixie's reputation among software security people is a little bit fraught.


Which is what makes the article so peculiar. He's either being exceptionally sloppy or...I don't know what the other options are.


Founder of ISC? Impressive! (But it doesn't make the article any better :)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: