Chromebooks in schools are enrolled in a corporate enrollment, even replacing the (small) SSD won't enable you to run an alternative OS unless you reflash coreboot or get the corporate administrator to release the device.
This manageability that is omnipresent, very hard to bypass and included for free is why Chromebooks are so popular, despite the ridiculously short 3 to 4 year software support lifespan of each Chromebook.
Also, students aren't always delicate with the equipment, so having a cheap device that can be easily replaced with the least amount of friction possible (most user settings will follow across devices, and if the device is already enrolled then policies are applied automatically)
I disagree. If you are a even modestly decent programmer you know to configure autoindentation so that you never need the tab key for anything. I cannot imagine a scenario where I would need the tab key in insert mode (except a very fringe case where I need to enter a tab character in a literal string and for some reason there are no escapes like \t. But then again you can still ^V^I)
can you point to a minimal example where vanilla vim autoindent cannot cope with python code editing? I never found any situation where I had to press the tab key
Have you ever refactored anything? Especially in Python, moving a line into a control block requires using the tab key. If you don't have to press the tab key either you're such a god programmer that you have never made a mistake or refactored anything you've ever written, or you're trolling.
I use markdown syntax for plain text even if I'm not displaying it as formatted HTML. Having the option to format headers and text automatically is nice to have especially if you're sharing it with others.
It's simple enough to search through if everything is neat.
This is great that people are against this technology but facial recognition will probably still be done through social media which a lot of these attendees will stream the entire time.
Lauri Love is a British national while Assange is a Australian national. Would the nationality of the defendant have an impact on the Westminster Magistrates' Court's decision?
In theory, no. Everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. The nationality of the subject isn't a factor that would have a particular bearing either way. The courts are supposed to look at where it makes sense to try the crime, rather than the nationality of the offender.
In this case, most of the evidence is presumably in the United States so it doesn't make sense for the trial to happen in the United Kingdom, assuming the United Kingdom has the relevant offence too (I haven't looked it up, but I presume it would be breaching the Official Secrets Act or something along those lines).
Obviously, it is more persuasive to have a British national tried at home (especially with comparative legal systems, e.g. the offence exists in both countries) rather than a foreign judicial system. The same cannot be said for a foreign national, especially if the foreign prosecuting authority will have a much stronger case built up than a domestic prosecuting authority could achieve.
The last 2 years alone, the human population increased by 1.2 billion.