What's wrong with using the slippery slope argument here? Regarding slippery slope logical fallacy:
> This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because there is no reason to believe that one event must inevitably follow from another without an argument for such a claim.
In this instance, plenty of reason and argument to believe this event will lead to another. It's what he campaigned on.
> There's zero mention to muslims in the text of the order
> This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because there is no reason to believe that one event must inevitably follow from another without an argument for such a claim.
In this instance, plenty of reason and argument to believe this event will lead to another. It's what he campaigned on.
> There's zero mention to muslims in the text of the order
Plenty of Muslim mentions in his campaign.