Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> implying the pill for women doesn't have equally bad side-effects. But they're more likely to take them, because they're the ones that end up pregnant.


> implying the pill for women doesn't have equally bad side-effects.

- I actually wasn't talking about the women's pill at all - you can tell this by reading the post you're replying to.

- But yes, inability to have sex is not a common side effect of the female pill. Which I suspect you also already know.

Have you considered reading the HN guidelines?


In case it isn't clear: yes the female pill causes depression. It may, also, like the recent male pill, cause suicidal thoughts. However the female pill categorically does not prevent coitus, whereas not having an erection does.


Also, the pill for women was the first product and therefore only had to be better than the alternative. A pill for men would be a substitute to the current one for women and would therefore have to show improvement over that. Investing several billion $ just to end up with a drug that has the same side effect taken by the other gender is not a wise investment. Yes, there's the topic of gender equality, but there are already other alternatives that come with less side effects (but are less convenient).


That's an excellent point. One possible improvement could be control by men of their own reproduction: ie, full contact sex without the possibility of conception if the male does not wish to conceive.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: