Outsmugging the smug surely does not count as substantive discussion so can we please just not go there?
If it helps we can argue that it breaks the "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize" guideline.
If it helps we can argue that it breaks the "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize" guideline.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html