Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"Analysts" who go contrarian on Apple are fairly common, and they have spent the past decade being wrong. At this point low-balling Apple has become so common that I think a lot of analysts do this just in case they manage to draw the lucky lottery ticket and "predict" a miss by Apple -- if they are correct their prediction stands out and when they are wrong they just get filed into the long, long list of bad Apple predictions.


If they are correct then their prediction is still just part of the long, long list. Why would it stand out?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: