That is part of the problem. It is very hard to quantify the consequences of economic depression because it affects everyone at least a little bit, and some more than others. It might cause so and so many more people to have to go through therapy, so and so many families break up over financial hardships, and the children are ever so slightly worse off and the second-order consequences aren't fully realised until 30 years down the line. It's individually (possibly) very small effects, but it hits the entire population.
That's hard to weigh against a concrete number of very concrete deaths and serious recuperation periods.
I'm saying that the two miseries feel like apples vs oranges, given the context.
You'd have to go pretty far to convince me that (even mass) economic depression is more harmful than widespread, near-term fatalities.