Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The "paradox of tolerance" states that a tolerant society must be intolerant of intolerance or else it will become an intolerant society.

That idea is frequently abused by people who don't know what tolerance is. These people conflate "tolerance" and "approval". What they actually oppose is disapproval (they only disapprove of people who disaprove). For them, being "against homosexuality" is intolerant. "Preferring Christianity to Islam" is intolerant. "Making a distinction between trans women and biological women" is intolerant. But this is all wrong. Tolerance is only possible in the presence of disapproval. To tolerate something is to put up with it.

A devout Christian who considers homosexuality a sin but who works with, is friends with, is neighbors with a gay couple is an example of tolerance. He doesn't like homosexuality but he puts up with it.

An example of intolerance is someone who tries to "deplatform" other people for disapproving of this or that. People can approve or disapprove of whatever they like. The qustion is whether they put up with it. As long as they do, they are tolerant.



So hatred is only hatred if you act on it?


There's a distinction to be made between disapproval and hatred. But there's plenty of both to go around.

Neither of them are synonymous with intolerance.


hatred begets intolerance


While true, a source and its causal sinks are still not identical. To whit - in a large enough free society, some will choose to offer themselves up for enslavement. Since freedom begets slavery, freedom is slavery. All’s well that’s Orwell, right?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: