Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't understand patents all that well, so perhaps somebody could help me understand: how are the things patented not totally absurd?


If you think you can patent utterly absurd things... well, you understand patents pretty well.


I don't understand the question - please rephrase.


I'll ruin your perfectly good joke by actually explaining what I meant:

Some patent applications really make sense to me. I read 'em and I say, "Wow, that was pretty clever. I never would have thought of that." Whether or not we should allow patents is a different question, but if we do, I get why the patent is valid.

These, though, I don't get. I know patents claims are a special language, so maybe I'm missing something, but I'm pretty sure a NeXT OS box circa 1991 running common apps covers all this.


Much clearer - thank you.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: