Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You seem to be making a lot of bad faith arguments in this comment section.

Why are you defending this deal so ferociously?



What is in bad faith? It’s assumed that ARM support is good now. I’d like to see more Tegra type chips, an open ARM device with updates Linux drivers from the manufacturer. I’d love to be pointed to a better one if you have it. I think what nvidia does with Linux GPUs is awful, but it is very different how they treat their ARM processors.

Please point me to good open ARM processor manufacturers that uploads good Linux updates, I’ll be happy to be wrong that the Jetson really isn’t the best.


All the SoCs available from https://www.96boards.org/ should have good mainline Linux support.

"Good manufacturers" today contribute directly to the upstream kernel, and frequently through Linaro kernel trees first.


Would you recommend any of these boards over a Jetson? I’m glad these exist but most of the specs look awful, and I’ve tried rockchip in pine hardware and it sucks.


I don't have much experience with the latest and greatest, and it surely depends on the types of workloads you plan to put on them.

Rockchip has a number of differently performing chips (RK3399Pro seems to perform well in comparison with Jetson: https://www.cnx-software.com/2019/05/15/toybrick-rk3399pro-b..., https://www.seeedstudio.com/blog/2019/12/05/rk3399pro-vs-ras...). Pine only recently introduced a RK3399-based board (non-Pro, basically lacking an NPU) version, so you might want to go with them for availability reasons.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: