See, I'm surprised that readings of the 10th Amendment aren't the end all be all answer to that statement.
>The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Oh, if you want to play that equivocation, then the no-fly list is a ban from interstate commerce? That sounds a lot like starting to abridge freedom of assembly (over there, across state lines within a predefined time period).
And lets be honest, the interstate commerce definition has been hogwash since case law got on the books stating that intra-state sale of grain could be regulated by Congress because of some indirect potential to affect markets across state lines; and such jurisprudence being utilized as a desperate lynchpin to try to keep individual states from unmaking the Federal level gun control framework.
I can play word games and run rings around the English language too, however, my goal is not to stretch what's on paper to create pretense for interfering in every U.S. citizen's life in ways that make it easier for more and more liberties to be stripped, and for the actual force of law to get increasingly hidden from the plain English meaning of an a reasonably literate individual.
Tired of the lazyness in applying 2nd plus order thinking to the spaghetti that is our legal code.
>The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.