The report calls for pricing to be dynamic based on time/congestion and take into account geography - a straight annual mileage report would not allow for this.
dynamic pricing can be trivially done with toll roads. Plenty of countries have toll roads with transponder tags. See, the big problem here is that you could share the transponder with a friends/family/co-workers and that makes spying more difficult. Doubleplusungood.
Therefore, we must install it right into your car, preferably at the factory, so you cannot remove it easily to make sure the spying data we get is of the highest quality.
They just want to spy on you, and with time control your car remotely, and they'll come up with all sorts of pretzel logic to justify it.
I assume license plate readers are much less work and expense for everyone than transponders.
I love Canada’s system. I simply got a bill in the mail in the United States based on my license plate they read, and no need to slow down traffic or deal with toll booths, or get a specific transponder for Canada.
Except this is not an issue and, in any case, not the issue here.
Number of cars on the road depends on population at this point an on the housing model. We don't build "more and more roads" just to accommodate an infinitely growing number of cars. This is a mature market, no the 1950s or 1960s. If areas are deemed too congested there are already ways to limit congestion.
No, this is a tax income problem caused by EV but they are taking the 'opportunity' to bamboozle us into thinking that trackers and dynamic pricing is required and that there is no alternative.
Here in the UK there may be congestion charges to enter certain zones, "Park and ride" schemes, limited and expensive parking space.
To install a tracker on every car along with all the infrastructure for handling and billing is calling a nuclear strike on a molehill. Again this is just some interests trying "to load the boat".
