Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The alternative being to ask above market the house so it sits on the market for longer ? I don't understand what Zillow changes in this story ? (I'm genuinely curious - not from US)


Zillow eliminates the notion of showings as an event. They plug in a smart lock and (at least to my understanding) you can tour the minute the listing goes up. There's no rushing to showings, your can tour any house that's in their portfolio on the market.


> Zillow eliminates the notion of showings as an event

Showings aren't an event unless the seller (perhaps through their agent) decides they should be.

> They plug in a smart lock and (at least to my understanding) you can tour the minute the listing goes up.

A lockbox with a key that buyers agents can get access to has been routine for sales of homes where the seller doesn't actively choose to limit showing for a long time; changing the technology doesn't fundamentally change anything. If access is made directly to buyers that would be a slight change in accessibility (also an increase in risk for the seller), but not, in practice, a huge difference.


Most investors seem to overask and let it sit on the market. The carrying cost of an extra month is more than offset by the higher final sale price.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: