Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This article puts together two graphs and absolutely give no backing as to which one is the causation of the other beyond "see?" or if there's any backing model for their correlation than one could go and test.

This is sensationalistic propaganda, not research.



You would honestly think that in 2022 someone would critically ask the author if they’re falling into a “correlation implies causation” fallacy.


Considering I'm being downvoted on top of that, I might have overvalued this community as well.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: