Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That case, to me, is indicative of a larger problem - it's 75 pages of arcane justifications, and yet I already knew how all of the justices had voted just from reading the premise, because like every Supreme Court case in a politicized area it was decided by personal conviction and the rest is post-hoc rationalization.

There is no hallucination on the part of the humans involved, only intellectual dishonesty.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: