Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You can't compare libraries to copying because you keep your copy forever.


That explains why they are not identical, that does not explain why they are not comparable. In both cases a single bought copy is shared with an indefinite number of non-paying readers.


There are some very important differences that make it incomparable:

* libraries have a limited amount of copies. So the amount of non-paying readers is not indefinate

* the readers have to return the copies of books or DVDs they have rented

These inconveniences makes buying a copy for personal use much more attractive for the consumer.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: