I don't think anyone has cared so much about what they look like as opposed to how and what they're doing when they do see them. There's also numerous first hand accounts from extremely reputable people that sort of do away with the need for high resolution photos. Taking everything together, the case is a lot more compelling than just "UFO because zoom can't zoom any better, the end".
You've completely missed the point of the article, and numerous times again when others tried to explain it to you. So I'll try one last time: If the aliens were real, at least some of the videos would show them clearly. None of the videos show them clearly, and that's not a coincidence. The only reason the videos are discussed at all is because the objects in the videos are not clear.
> what they're doing when they do see them.
They aren't shown to be doing anything strange. All of the videos show mundane movement. You're being tricked by parallax.
> extremely reputable people
It all boils down to "navy pilots wouldn't lie to me". It's a complete joke.
>If the aliens were real, at least some of the videos would show them clearly.
Says who? Did I miss the memo?
>It's a complete joke.
The Pentagon seems to take it seriously enough, even creating the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office to track "anomalous, unidentified space, airborne, submerged and transmedium objects." Least they're having a laugh with it!
