You're basically suggesting that to do a complete step change every 3 years might be considered "more efficient" but literally nobody would consider that more efficient, it would just add massively more risk into the whole process and be recouped later by delays. That is agile v. waterfall 101, and even IBM is perfectly capable of understanding that.
That is to say nothing of the fact that Fedora is used very extensively internally, and that there are hardware partners like Lenovo that sell it preinstalled, and Fedora Asahi which is the new home of Apple hardware enablement (and thus the best Aarch64 development platform). The Fedora ecosystem is extremely valuable to Red Hat.
That is to say nothing of the fact that Fedora is used very extensively internally, and that there are hardware partners like Lenovo that sell it preinstalled, and Fedora Asahi which is the new home of Apple hardware enablement (and thus the best Aarch64 development platform). The Fedora ecosystem is extremely valuable to Red Hat.