Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This kind of interview question really pisses me off. It's basically an attempt at amateur psychologizing in the interview process, and since the questioner is generally completely unqualified to seriously analyze the answer, the reaction generally has nothing to do with "corporate culture" but everything to do with the prejudices and preferences of the interviewer. Sometimes those prejudices are trivial ("oh, he cares about external noise and so do I") but often they are windows through which more serious cultural and gender prejudices sneak in.

I mean, so if the interviewee says that healthcare is incredibly important because they have a sick child, that doesn't tell you anything at all about how well they'll do at the job (but hiring managers often have strong feelings one way or another about the importance of family). And so what if you manage to trick them into saying they felt unappreciated at their last job: you have no idea what the last job was really like, what information could you possibly gain?

It's true that questions like this can be very revealing. They seldom review anything relevant about the interviewee, but they do reveal that the hiring manager is an incompetent jerk.



Immediate alarm bells ringing. As an interviewer, you do not want to know that. Whenever a candidate would mention something that revealed a lifestyle choice or other circumstance that was or might be covered by discrimination legislation, I'd have to painstakingly fill out the HR forms so if I rejected them, all our bases were covered. Otherwise it was a simple one liner, like "weak X skills".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: