Historically, secession from the union is frowned upon. See: the bloodiest war in US history. On the other hand, my former employer Dean Kamen did jokingly found his own country on North Dumpling Island and signed a non-aggression pact. He seceded when he was denied a permit to build a wind turbine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Dumpling_Island

That's pretty interesting. I'm curious: If he founded his own country, why did he need a permit?

Edit: Oh, right.

Seceding from a country and seceding from a city seem like two different things.

"He seceded when he was denied a permit"

What was it like working with him? Dean Kamen is on my list of "someday".

If that's a legal question then no, no more than I can secede along with my backyard. The fact that your land happens to be surrounded by water doesn't give it any special legal status, the law of the United States does not allow landowners to secede.

If that's a practical question, then all he has to do is to declare independence and then be prepared to win a war against the United States when it chooses to militarily dispute that claim. As Larry Ellison is unlikely to be able to win a war against the United States, I'd say the answer here is also no.

"As Larry Ellison is unlikely to be able to win a war against the United States, I'd say the answer here is also no."

I wonder… "Hey Operations? It's Larry. Shut down all Oracle and Java applications running inside .gov networks. Right now. Every single one."

;-)

I'm now wondering what sort of mayhem one could cause with vendor access to every Oracle db the US .gov uses, presumably you could forge orders, reorganize parts of the executive and identify and suborn most of the people who would be in a position to stop you...

If he builds a monorail, I guess it'll be obvious.

The govermentwould take over

I am quite interested in this subject. What is the legal process of starting a country? Is there any land available in the world which can be bought for starting a new country?

Prince Leonard of the Hutt River Province formed a micronation back in the 1970s. I grew up an hour or two from the Province, most people think it was a bit of a clever hack - he even declared war on Australia at one stage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Hutt_River

Sure - check out Sealand: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Sealand and more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Micronations

iirc (parts of) Somalia doesn't have proper government, so you probably could try to start your country there. I'd recommend getting couple hundred/thousand mercenaries to keep your peace there...

If you'd rule fairly, you even could have a chance of Western world accepting you, as even good dictatorship would be a massive improvement compared to the current conditions.

There is no legal process for starting a country, because laws are made by countries, and once you're starting your own there's no legal framework to operate under.

The practical process for starting a country is to control a piece of land militarily, declare yourself independent, and then persuade other countries to recognize your claim. They're incredibly unlikely to do so, unless you can really back that claim up with something. Even countries which are large, have functioning governments and reasonably powerful militaries can't be guaranteed universal acceptance, e.g. Taiwan.

Nobody will sell you land on which to start your own country. Your best bet for land not currently subject to any territorial claims would be Marie Byrd Land:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Byrd_Land

a Mongolia-sized slice of unclaimed land in Antarctica. You'd still have a tough time getting anyone to accept your claim, though. Also, it's cold.

One subtle point: there are sometimes legal processes for declaring independence from a host country.

The most clear example of this is the Statute of Westminster 1931, which the Parliament of the UK passed in order to create a legal process by which its colonies could file for legal independence.

As I understand it, in British law classes, there is often a question asked of students: "If Parliament repealed the Statute of Westminster today, would we (in principle, legally) get all of those colonies back? Does Parliament have the right to repeal the Statute of Westminster and the grants of independence under it, or were they something otherwise unprecedented in law: a surrender, effective forever, of certain legal powers?" Etc.

So yes, there are sometimes legal processes for starting a country, although the U.S. doesn't really have one. The U.S. does allow you to apply for statehood however, so it might be interesting to immediately declare independence (illegally) and then immediately apply to become a state (legally) to see which imperative wins out.

"There is no legal process for starting a country"

Well, there is no global legal process for starting a country because pretty much all territory is already claimed.

However, plenty of countries have split apart recently (e.g. Czechoslovakia into the Czech Republic and Slovakia) and indeed by own "country" of Scotland is about to consider splitting from the UK.