Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You could make it buoyancy-neutral and have it float-melt its way back—heater pointed up.


I'd never considered the pressure under an ice cap... it would scale with depth, no?

So a water channel within the ice (going "up" from the sea below) would have a decreasing pressure gradient as it ascended?


I would imagine the water channel would re-freeze fairly rapidly, so you'd end up with a "bubble" of liquid water around the thing slowly melting itself down.


Point. Is ice sufficiently plastic to exert pressure with depth? I honestly don't know.

E.g. What would the pressure of a bubble of water under 1km of ice vs 15km of ice?


The ice clearly moves, as Europa's surface isn't just same as an airless, solid ball-of-rock's default: craters, but has all sorts of features that reshape the surface, so given enough time, it'll equilibrate. (What 'enough' means is left as an exercise to the reader). There are papers[1] that discuss the ice properties, but it's hard to get a specific answer out of them. There have to be tons of research papers out there about the design criteria for melt-drill probes like this, for Europa, Enceladus, and others.

[1]: https://websites.pmc.ucsc.edu/~fnimmo/website/draft5.pdf




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: