Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The assertion in the issue report is that Claude saw a sharp decline in quality over the last few months. However, the report itself was allegedly generated by Claude.

Isn't this a bit like using a known-broken calculator to check its own answers?



If a known-broken calculator claims it's broken, I more or less concur. (Chain of reasoning omitted here.)


if it's not broken then we trust the assertion that it's broken. if it's broken then it's broken.

it's analysis of what is broken is probably wrong or at least incomplete though




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: