That's probably the goal

You get nothing being the go-to person vs. the person that just does the job

Option B would involve being incredibly verbose and burying prompt injections in your question.

The sabot of the AI era. Love it.

You might get fired for still using spreadsheets. ;)

Ha. I refer back to my previous comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278108

When your spreadsheet gets full, will you change jobs or change tactic?

I get that this is supposed to be unproductive snark, but the real answer is probably to then sort the spreadsheet and assign a tier system of how annoying and useless each person in it is.

It was not snark (an uncharitable read I must say). The point was everyone is being forced to use AI. So keeping a shitlist is going to be a very, very short term solution.

> everyone is being forced to use AI

Some small subset of companies are doing this, not all companies.

We need to go deeper: ELO and matchmaking to keep the most annoying coworkers contained playing with each other

I'll have a peaceful life until it gets to my yearly management review of my teams.

Switch to a DB

That seems like a lot of bother. If I hit the 1,048,576 row limit I'd start a new column.

I think they own the company at that point.