Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Opportunity cost?

They have $X in their budget. If the remote employees are producing $Y value, where $Y>$X, then they are earning their keep. But suppose Yahoo believes they can yield 1.5Y for the same $X budget by having on-site workers?

It's not like companies are (or should be) altruistic democracies. I can see why a person affected by this would be sore, but they don't really have a valid gripe IMO. I'm personally a fan of at-will employment.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: